ArticleBlood research2026
Next-generation digital polymerase chain reaction assay for BCR::ABL1 in chronic myeloid leukemia: comprehensive validation for standardized measurable residual disease detection.
Article in Blood research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe sensitivity of real-time quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) for detecting measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who have achieved a deep molecular response is limited. We validated a digital PCR (dPCR) assay (LQ Check BCR::ABL1 Major %IS Kit) for MRD quantification.
methodsValidation was performed according to CLSI guidelines EP17-A2, EP06, EP05-A3, and EP07 using BCR::ABL1-positive and -negative materials and the World Health Organization (WHO) 1st International Standard. A nonparametric analysis of the limit of blank was used to establish a positivity cutoff of ≥ 2 droplets. The limit of detection (LoD) was verified using a detection criterion of ≥ 95%, and the limit of quantitation (LoQ) was defined as the lowest level meeting ≥ 95% detection and a study-defined %CV of ≤ 76%. Clinical validation included 72 CML specimens for molecular response (MR) category comparisons and 67 specimens for paired quantitative comparisons.
resultsThe LoD and LoQ were both 0.0025% on the International Scale (IS) with a detection rate of 95.8%. The assay showed linearity over 5 logs (R
conclusionThe LQ Check BCR::ABL1 Major %IS Kit enabled sensitive, precise, and reproducible BCR::ABL1 quantification at MR4.6. The clinical significance of a deeper MR classification using dPCR, particularly for treatment-free remission, requires longitudinal validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42886318What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.