ReviewIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2026
Outcomes of Clostridium difficile infection in liver transplant patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a significant healthcare-associated complication, especially for liver transplant (LT) recipients who are at increased risk due to their immuno-suppressed status and antibiotic use. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at elucidating the outcomes of CDI in LT recipients.
methodsWe adhered to PRISMA guidelines and searched databases including CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase and Scopus until December 2024. Studies included LT recipients with and without CDI. Outcomes were pooled using meta-analytic techniques with risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous data and mean differences for continuous data.
resultsAmong 10 included studies (1,216,500 LT recipients; 3.2% with CDI), the primary pooled analysis showed no significant difference in mortality (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.38-4.72; I
conclusionIn addition to a significant association between PPI use and increased risk of CDI, CDI significantly affects mortality, duration of hospital stays and pre-operative MELD scores in LT recipients, underscoring its impact on post-operative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42886315What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.