Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42886308›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Automated Segmentation of Wound Bed Tissue from Clinical Photographs: A Benchmark of Five Deep Learning Architectures Under a Shared Protocol.

David Reifs, Lorena Casanova-Lozano, Jordi Solé-Casals, Andrea Coda

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David Reifs *Data and Signal Processing Research Group (DSP), Universitat de Vic - Universitat Central de Catalunya (UVic-UCC), Sagrada Família 7, 08500, Vic, Barcelona, Spain. david.reifs@uvic.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2945-9803
Lorena Casanova-Lozano *Digital Care Research Group, Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), Universitat de Vic - Universitat Central de Catalunya (UVic-UCC), Sagrada Família 7, 08500, Vic, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6279-7455
Jordi Solé-CasalsData and Signal Processing Research Group (DSP), Universitat de Vic - Universitat Central de Catalunya (UVic-UCC), Sagrada Família 7, 08500, Vic, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6534-1979
Andrea CodaSchool of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0427-6672

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate characterisation of the wound bed, the relative proportions of granulation, slough and necrotic tissue described by the red-yellow-black model, is central to monitoring healing and guiding debridement in chronic-wound care, yet in routine practice, it is judged visually and is poorly reproducible between clinicians. We investigated automatic, pixel-level segmentation of these three classes within the wound region of interest. A corpus of 404 photographs was curated from a public wound image collection and densely annotated by wound care clinicians with a purpose-built, cluster-assisted labelling tool. Five deep learning architectures spanning convolutional, transformer, hybrid and ensemble families were trained on one frozen data split under a largely shared pipeline, with limited, fully documented architecture-specific tuning, and scored on a shared 62-image test set. The models fell within a narrow mean intersection-over-union band (0.748-0.818). The strongest single model, a purely convolutional network, was statistically indistinguishable from the best ensemble, and simply averaging already-trained convolutional and transformer models matched that ensemble at no additional training cost. Slough remained consistently the hardest tissue. Translated into clinical units, per-wound tissue percentages were recovered with small mean bias (within ± 5 percentage points) but wide single-image limits of agreement (about ± 25-50 percentage points), so the measurement suits aggregate and longitudinal assessment rather than single-image reading. Within this dataset, split and training protocol, the choice among the strong hierarchical architectures was not decisive: a single strong model is the pragmatic option for clinical deployment, with an ensemble reserved for maximal accuracy and class balance.

Indexed as

Chronic woundsDeep learningGranulation tissueMedical image analysisSemantic segmentationSloughWound bed assessment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.