ArticleMolecular biology reports2026
Integrated in silico and in vitro analysis identifies a co-expression pattern associated with cisplatin/5-FU treatment response and metastatic features in gastric cancer.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGastric cancer remains a major cause of cancer mortality worldwide, and treatment failure is frequently associated with chemotherapy resistance and metastatic progression. Although cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil are commonly used components of gastric cancer chemotherapy, the extent to which gene-miRNA expression patterns associated with treatment response overlap with metastatic features remains incompletely understood.
methodsWe integrated transcriptomic analysis of pretreatment GSE14210 samples with STRING network analysis and target-centric miRNA prioritization. Prioritized genes and miRNAs were evaluated by qRT-PCR in metastatic versus non-metastatic gastric cancer tissues and in MKN-45 3D spheroids exposed to cisplatin/5-FU; one patient-derived spheroid model was included as a feasibility observation.
resultsAnalysis of the pretreatment GSE14210 cohort identified 414 upregulated DEGs, including 63 highly connected hubs (degree ≥ 10); 21 of these were also upregulated in tumor-versus-normal GEPIA comparisons. In metastatic tissues, CXCL8, MMP9, STAT1, miR-17-5p, miR-24-3p, and miR-124-3p were significantly increased, whereas miR-145-5p was significantly decreased; CCL5 was not significantly different. In cisplatin/5-FU-treated MKN-45 spheroids, CXCL8, MMP9, STAT1, miR-17-5p, miR-24-3p, and miR-124-3p showed significant expression changes, whereas CCL5 and miR-145-5p did not. MKN-45 spheroids regrew after cyclic exposure, consistent with an adaptive drug-tolerant phenotype, whereas the single patient-derived model showed limited recovery.
conclusionThese findings identify context-dependent candidate co-expression patterns across metastatic tissues and chemotherapy-exposed 3D models. They do not establish a shared causal mechanism and require functional validation in independent cohorts and additional patient-derived models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42886301What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.