Trial reportJournal of robotic surgery2026
Safety and efficacy of a novel miniaturized robotic assisted surgery system in hysterectomy: a prospective, investigational device exemption clinical trial.
Trial report in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06028542 ([Trial of device that is not approved or cleared by the U.S. FDA]), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
[Trial of device that is not approved or cleared by the U.S. FDA]
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate safety and effectiveness of the first-in-kind miniaturized surgical robotic platform, the MIRA Surgical System, in patients presenting with an indication for benign hysterectomy. A prospective, multi-center, multi-operator, non-randomized, consecutively enrolled Investigational Device Exemption Clinical Trial. Five surgeons participated across three types of institutions. Thirty-five patients with a mean age of 46.1 years (range 25-74) and a mean BMI of 29.2 kg/m² (range 21.5-41.5) were operated upon. Indications were menorrhagia (71.4%), fibroids (28.6%), and/or dysmenorrhea (25.7%). A total hysterectomy with uni-/bi-lateral salpingectomy was performed in 80%, a total hysterectomy with uni-/bi-lateral salpingo-oophorectomy in 14.3% and a total hysterectomy without adnexectomy in 5.7%. One subject required conversion to a laparoscopy due to a technical malfunction. Mean estimated blood loss was 52.6 ml (median 50 ml; range 10-200 ml). Specimens weighed from 31.2 g to 384 g (mean 136.1 g). No malignancies were identified. Vaginal-cuff closure was successfully completed in 34 cases, and completed vaginally in the converted case. Mean procedure duration was 141.8 min (median 127; range 73-273). Mean length of stay post-operatively was 5.0 h (median 3.5; range 1.3-29.4 h). Ten adverse events were reported: two intraoperative device-related and eight postoperative procedure-related (Seven Clavien-Dindo Grade-I, three Grade-II; no Grade-III or higher events). All resolved. The MIRA Surgical System demonstrated technical feasibility and an acceptable short-term safety profile in a selected cohort of patients undergoing benign hysterectomy. Evaluation in larger, diverse cohorts, with longer follow-up is required. (Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov, TRN: NCT06028542, Registration date: 16 August 2023.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
42886291What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.