SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2026
Preoperative ureteral rest and outcomes of robot-assisted upper urinary tract reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate whether a preoperative period of ureteral rest, defined as the absence of any indwelling stent crossing the diseased or anastomotic segment (irrespective of whether upper-tract drainage is maintained by a percutaneous nephrostomy), is associated with improved surgical success and perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted upper urinary tract reconstruction, comprising ureteral reconstruction and pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection and the Cochrane Library from inception to 31 July 2026, and included English-language studies that compared ureteral rest with immediate reconstruction. Studies without a no-rest comparator or without the key outcomes were excluded. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed in Review Manager 5.3 and R, using odds ratios (OR) or risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. The review was registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD420261504719). Five retrospective comparative studies including 707 patients (478 managed with preoperative ureteral rest and 229 managed without) were analysed. Preoperative ureteral rest was associated with a higher pooled surgical success rate (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.57 to 5.07, P = 0.0005; 447/478 [93.5%] versus 198/229 [86.5%]; absolute risk difference + 7.6%, 95% CI 2.9% to 12.4%) and with a small reduction in estimated intraoperative blood loss (MD -23.91 mL, 95% CI -35.79 to -12.03, P < 0.0001; three studies). No statistically significant differences were detected for operative time (MD 7.00 min, 95% CI -2.05 to 16.05, P = 0.13), length of hospital stay (MD -0.26 days, 95% CI -1.00 to 0.48, P = 0.49; I2 = 95%) or postoperative complications (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.31, P = 0.40). Subgroup analyses by indication showed no significant interaction for any outcome (P for subgroup difference: surgical success 0.97, operative time 0.59, complications 0.98); the confidence interval for the ureteropelvic junction obstruction subgroup was wide because only two studies contributed data. Available retrospective comparative evidence suggests that preoperative ureteral rest is associated with higher surgical success after robot-assisted upper urinary tract reconstruction and with a small reduction in estimated blood loss. No clear association was observed with operative time, length of stay or postoperative complications. Because the available evidence is limited to a small number of retrospective studies with heterogeneous indications, definitions and reconstructive techniques, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating. Current data are insufficient to establish whether the effect differs between acquired ureteral strictures and ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42886285What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.