Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Pediatric Venous Excess Ultrasound Score (P-VExUS): a novel approach to assess central venous pressure in the PICU.
Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate assessment of central venous pressure (CVP) in critically ill children is important for guiding fluid management but remains challenging, as invasive monitoring is not always feasible and noninvasive tools are limited. We aimed to develop and validate pediatric adaptations of the Venous Excess Ultrasound Score (P-VExUS) for bedside estimation of CVP in mechanically ventilated children. This prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary-care PICU. Fifty-six mechanically ventilated children were included. Venous Doppler ultrasonography of the inferior vena cava, hepatic, portal, and intrarenal veins was performed at the bedside. Two P-VExUS models were evaluated: (1) a categorical grading system (0-III) and (2) a semiquantitative point-based score (0-7). Diagnostic performance was assessed for predefined, clinically relevant CVP thresholds reflecting low (< 7 mmHg) and elevated (> 12 mmHg) venous pressure states using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Both models were significantly associated with measured CVP. For predicting elevated CVP, model 1 showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.74 (95% CI 0.61-0.85), with 45% sensitivity and 98% specificity. Model 2 demonstrated superior accuracy (AUROC 0.94, 95% CI 0.84-0.98), with 82% sensitivity and 91% specificity (p < 0.001). For detecting low CVP, model 2 also outperformed model 1 (AUROC 0.80 vs. 0.69; p = 0.02). Intrarenal vein patterns had the highest discriminative ability (AUROC 0.92).
conclusionPediatric-specific P-VExUS models were feasible and accurate for estimating CVP in critically ill children. The point-based model showed superior diagnostic performance and may represent a promising noninvasive bedside tool for assessing venous congestion. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Elevated central venous pressure (CVP) is associated with adverse outcomes in critically ill children, including mortality and renal dysfunction. • Inferior vena cava-based ultrasound indices have limited accuracy for estimating CVP in mechanically ventilated children, while pediatric adaptations of the Venous Excess Ultrasound Score (VExUS) remain poorly defined. WHAT IS NEW: • This study proposes and evaluates two pediatric adaptations of VExUS, demonstrating superior diagnostic performance of a point-based model for identifying elevated (12 mmHg) and low (7 mmHg) CVP. • Intrarenal venous Doppler showed the highest individual discriminative performance, suggesting potential simplification of venous congestion assessment in critically ill children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42886274What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.