ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Long-term outcomes after ankle fracture-Where do we stand?]
Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With an incidence of approximately 74 per 100,000 people per year, ankle fractures are among the most frequent fractures in adults and are considered a major cause of posttraumatic ankle osteoarthritis. Reliable long-term data (≥ 10 years) are scarce. The aim of this study was to review the existing literature regarding long-term treatment outcomes following surgical management of ankle fractures. A narrative literature review was conducted. Studies were identified that reported on the treatment outcomes of surgically managed ankle fractures with a follow-up period of at least 10 years. A total of 20 studies with a mean follow-up period of 12.9 years were identified. On average the long-term outcomes were good to very good; however, depending on the patient population and scoring system 11-30% of patients reported only moderate to poor outcomes. Moderate to severe osteoarthritis was radiologically found in 18-100% of cases, although it was often asymptomatic. The conversion rate to arthrodesis or endoprosthesis ranged from 0-3% across all studies. Across the studies, only fracture complexity, development of osteoarthritis over time and depression had an impact on the outcome. In our own cohort, the number of fractured malleoli was the only significant influencing factor. Overall, the quality of the studies was at times unsatisfactory and, above all, comparability was limited. In the future, a standardization of the parameters collated would be valuable in order, for example, to evaluate the effectiveness of different surgical procedures across multiple studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42886267What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.