ArticleJournal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs2026
Association between pre-processing total protein and processing time in drop-type cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy.
Article in Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting processing time in drop-type cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART) remains difficult. We examined whether pre-processing total protein (TP) was associated with processing time after accounting for ascites amount, processing height, ascites etiology, and repeated sessions. We retrospectively analyzed 97 CART sessions in 51 patients. Log-transformed processing time was analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model including pre-processing TP, pre-processing ascites amount, processing height (140 or 200 cm), and ascites etiology as fixed effects, with patient as a random intercept. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of pre-processing TP for an above-preferred-range session-averaged processing rate (>2,000 mL/h) was secondary and exploratory. Higher pre-processing TP (β = 0.259, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.194-0.325; P < 0.001), greater ascites amount per 1,000 g (β = 0.270, 95% CI 0.234-0.305; P < 0.001), and 140-cm versus 200-cm processing height (β = 0.161, 95% CI 0.038-0.284; P = 0.012) were associated with longer processing time, whereas ascites etiology was not significantly associated. The overall ROC cutoff was 1.2 g/dL (area under the curve (AUC), 0.931), and the first-session AUC was 0.947 (95% CI, 0.884-1.000). Higher pre-processing TP remained significantly associated with longer processing time after accounting for ascites amount, processing height, ascites etiology, and repeated sessions. Pre-processing TP may serve as a practical workflow-oriented indicator in drop-type CART, whereas ROC-derived cutoffs should be interpreted as exploratory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42886260What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.