ArticleEuropean radiology2026
VERIDAH: solving enumeration anomaly-aware vertebra labeling across imaging sequences.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAlthough the identification of enumeration anomalies has potential clinical implications for chronic back pain and operation planning, the thoracolumbar junction is poorly assessed and rarely described in clinical reports. Additionally, even though multiple deep-learning-based vertebra labeling algorithms exist, there is a lack of methods to automatically label enumeration anomalies. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe introduce "Vertebra Identification with Anomaly Handling" (VERIDAH), a novel vertebra labeling algorithm based on multiple classification heads combined with a weighted vertebra sequence prediction algorithm. We use the NAKO dataset for MRI and a CT cohort to retrospectively evaluate the labeling performance by computing how often the model is correct in predicting the vertebra labels, including enumeration anomalies. Statistical significance was assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
resultsOn 1000 T2w sagittal (mean age 52 ± 11, 52% female) and 365 CT (mean age 74 ± 21, 44% female) images, we show that our approach surpasses existing models on T2w TSE sagittal (98.30% vs. 94.24% of subjects with all vertebrae correctly labeled, p < 0.01) and CT imaging (99.18% vs. 77.26% of subjects with all vertebrae correctly labeled, p < 0.01) and works in arbitrary field-of-view images. VERIDAH correctly labeled the presence of thoracic enumeration anomalies in 87.80% and 96.30% of T2w and CT images, respectively, and lumbar enumeration anomalies in 94.48% and 97.22% for T2w and CT, respectively.
conclusionVERIDAH offers enumeration anomaly robust vertebra labeling in CT and T2w sagittal imaging and is publicly released along with a spine segmentation model. KEY POINTS: QuestionAutomatically identifying enumeration anomalies in the spine is important in determining the correct vertebra labels, especially in limited field-of-view imaging. FindingsA carefully designed classifier with multiple classification heads and a sequence predictor provides superior results on large benchmarks, both in CT and MRI. Clinical relevanceThe proposed method identifies vertebra levels even in very limited field-of-view imaging, and correctly predicts enumeration anomalies, making downstream tasks such as surgery planning easier. Its public availability enables studies and applications to take these spinal anomalies into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42886249What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.