ArticleDiabetologia2026
Evolving phenotype of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: a 15-year population-based comparison.
Article in Diabetologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aims/hypothesisOur aim was to describe the phenotype at diagnosis and the early therapeutic profile of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes across two periods spanning approximately 15 years within the same integrated healthcare system.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data from Clalit Health Services (Haifa & Western Galilee, Israel). Adults with incident type 2 diabetes in 2005-2008 (period 1: n=80,201) were compared with those diagnosed in 2020-2023 (period 2: n=101,392). Between-period differences are presented as crude estimates, with an age-stratified sensitivity analysis, and quantified using standardised mean differences (SMDs; values ≥0.20 indicate at least a small effect) alongside non-parametric and χ
resultsThe median age at diagnosis increased from 63.0 to 66.7 years between the two periods; the proportion aged ≥85 years nearly doubled (from 3.5% to 6.6%). The score for the Charlson comorbidity index increased from 4 to 6 (SMD 0.48); metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) increased from 4.4% to 18.6%. HbA CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationThe phenotype of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes has been fundamentally restructured since 2008: patients are older with a higher comorbidity burden but present with better glycaemic and lipid management, with the latter reflecting statin therapy already established before diagnosis. MASLD has emerged as a major but largely ascertainment-driven comorbidity. The shift to SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1RAs alongside declining sulfonylurea use indicates displacement of glucose-centric strategies by a cardiorenal- and weight-driven paradigm. These findings indicate a need for age-appropriate management and trials enrolling very elderly patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42886236What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.