ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2026
[An insight into the long/post COVID care situation in Germany-a rapid scoping review].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLong/post COVID and related conditions such as myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome and post-vaccination syndrome are associated with persistent functional impairments and are met with care structures in Germany that are difficult to navigate.
objectiveThe rapid scoping review offers an insight into care structures, capacities, access, care pathways and gaps in care for these patient groups in the German healthcare system. It also takes into account patient and care provider perspectives.
methodsThe study follows the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute and the PRISMA ScR checklist for conducting (rapid) scoping reviews. A MEDLINE search was conducted from 2020 onwards with predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria for evidence sources related to care in Germany.
results44 evidence sources were included. General practitioners and paediatricians act as the first point of contact. Specialised outpatient clinics and rehabilitation facilities take on complex diagnostics and patient treatment. Care networks are rare. Navigating the healthcare system is characterised by information gaps, unclear responsibilities and long waiting times, so that those affected often organise their own care. Some report stigmatisation, misdiagnoses and stressful activation recommendations despite the risk of post exertional malaise.
conclusionCare is unevenly accessible, poorly coordinated and only limitedly evidence based. Shared knowledge and case databases, training, better diagnostic tools and robust efficacy studies are needed to improve access, management and safety of long/post COVID care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42886231What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.