Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42886209›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

Acceptability of a Peer-Led Faith-Based Intervention to Improve Breast, Bowel and Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake Among UK Muslim Women: A Qualitative Evaluation.

Rawand Jarrar, Kathryn A Robb, Marie K Murphy, Cerysh Sadiq, Anna Matthews, Fozia Haider, Alex McConnachie, Aasim I Padela, Floor Christie-de Jong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rawand JarrarSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9452-8249
Kathryn A RobbSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1672-0411
Marie K MurphySchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Cerysh SadiqSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.
Anna MatthewsSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Fozia HaiderSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.
Alex McConnachieSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Aasim I PadelaMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4834-2889
Floor Christie-de JongSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5275-8030

Funding

Cancer Research UK EDDPJT-May22\100030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly cancer detection through screening can improve treatment outcomes. However, screening uptake remains lower among some communities, including Muslim women, which puts them at risk of late diagnosis and poor outcomes. In 2020, we worked with 10 Scottish Muslim women to co-design a peer-led, faith-based and culturally tailored intervention to encourage uptake of breast, bowel and cervical cancer screening. The intervention was delivered twice online and qualitatively evaluated. The study was subsequently funded as a feasibility trial, and the intervention was delivered a further 16 times, both online and face-to-face. This paper reports findings from a qualitative evaluation exploring participants' perspectives on the acceptability and implementation of the intervention.

methodsThe intervention is a 2-h workshop comprising four components: (1) a peer-led cancer screening discussion, (2) a doctor-led health education session, (3) testimonials from Muslim women, and (4) an Islamic perspective delivered by a female religious scholar. In 2024, women participated in online or in-person workshops in North-East England and Scotland. After each workshop, women were invited to participate in focus groups or interviews to provide feedback on the workshop. Qualitative data collection and analysis were guided by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Data were analysed using the Framework Analysis method.

resultsA convenience sample of 36 women was recruited. Participants described the workshop's content as comprehensive and providing new information. The workshop's informal atmosphere and use of different delivery methods enhanced information attainment. They appreciated the use of interpreters, who assisted non-English speakers. Bringing a medical and Islamic perspective together was novel to participants and made the workshop more impactful. Participants expressed more positive attitudes towards screening after the intervention.

conclusionA peer-led, culturally-tailored and faith-based intervention for improving cancer screening uptake for Muslim women was deemed acceptable. However, more work is needed to assess the intervention's effectiveness and impact. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The intervention was co-designed with 10 Muslim women. A public involvement group worked with the research team throughout the study; they provided their views on the intervention, recruitment, data collection and interpretation of findings. Some were trained as peer educators to help deliver the intervention. Two members of the community (FH and CS, who are also listed as authors) were also employed on the project as Community Recruitment Leads, facilitating participant recruitment and contributing to all stages of the research as valued members of the research team, ensuring the community's voice was embedded throughout.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerIslamPatient Acceptance of Health CarePeer GroupUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchScotlandUnited Kingdomacceptabilitybowel cancerbreast cancercancer screeningcervical cancerfaithhealth inequitiesMuslim womenparticipatory researchreligious tailoring

Identifiers

PMID42886209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.