ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026
Acceptability of a Peer-Led Faith-Based Intervention to Improve Breast, Bowel and Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake Among UK Muslim Women: A Qualitative Evaluation.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly cancer detection through screening can improve treatment outcomes. However, screening uptake remains lower among some communities, including Muslim women, which puts them at risk of late diagnosis and poor outcomes. In 2020, we worked with 10 Scottish Muslim women to co-design a peer-led, faith-based and culturally tailored intervention to encourage uptake of breast, bowel and cervical cancer screening. The intervention was delivered twice online and qualitatively evaluated. The study was subsequently funded as a feasibility trial, and the intervention was delivered a further 16 times, both online and face-to-face. This paper reports findings from a qualitative evaluation exploring participants' perspectives on the acceptability and implementation of the intervention.
methodsThe intervention is a 2-h workshop comprising four components: (1) a peer-led cancer screening discussion, (2) a doctor-led health education session, (3) testimonials from Muslim women, and (4) an Islamic perspective delivered by a female religious scholar. In 2024, women participated in online or in-person workshops in North-East England and Scotland. After each workshop, women were invited to participate in focus groups or interviews to provide feedback on the workshop. Qualitative data collection and analysis were guided by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Data were analysed using the Framework Analysis method.
resultsA convenience sample of 36 women was recruited. Participants described the workshop's content as comprehensive and providing new information. The workshop's informal atmosphere and use of different delivery methods enhanced information attainment. They appreciated the use of interpreters, who assisted non-English speakers. Bringing a medical and Islamic perspective together was novel to participants and made the workshop more impactful. Participants expressed more positive attitudes towards screening after the intervention.
conclusionA peer-led, culturally-tailored and faith-based intervention for improving cancer screening uptake for Muslim women was deemed acceptable. However, more work is needed to assess the intervention's effectiveness and impact. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The intervention was co-designed with 10 Muslim women. A public involvement group worked with the research team throughout the study; they provided their views on the intervention, recruitment, data collection and interpretation of findings. Some were trained as peer educators to help deliver the intervention. Two members of the community (FH and CS, who are also listed as authors) were also employed on the project as Community Recruitment Leads, facilitating participant recruitment and contributing to all stages of the research as valued members of the research team, ensuring the community's voice was embedded throughout.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42886209What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.