ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2026
Correlation Properties of Heart Rate Variability for Exercise Intensity Monitoring and Prescription During Constant-Load Cycling: A Comparison With Traditional Physiological Variables.
Article in European journal of sport science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the applicability of the short-term scaling exponent alpha 1 of detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA-a1) as a marker of internal load during constant-load cycling. The aim was to explore DFA-a1 dynamics across the moderate, heavy, and severe intensity domains and assess its utility for both monitoring and prescribing exercise intensity. Sixteen untrained adults (3 women) performed an incremental cycling stage test and three constant-load sessions (moderate, heavy, and severe). Gas exchange kinetics, blood lactate concentration, and heart rate (HR) were measured. Ventilatory (VTs), lactate, and HR variability (HRV) thresholds were determined and used to define training zones. A two-factor repeated-measures ANOVA and the Friedman test assessed intensity- and method-related effects. Significant intensity × time interactions were observed for all variables (p < 0.001). DFA-a1 remained stable without crossing the first HRV threshold throughout moderate exercise, while in the heavy and severe domains, it showed a drift over time, mirroring the behaviour of traditional markers. In the moderate session, DFA-a1-based prescription maintained > 94% session time and 87%-100% of participants within the desired zone, outperforming HR methods based on VTs (71% time, 50%-81% participants; p < 0.05). In the heavy and severe domains, corresponding values were > 23% and > 50%, whereas gas exchange or lactate prescriptions exceeded 44% and 65%, respectively (p < 0.01). DFA-a1 appears to be a suitable tool for monitoring internal load, especially in moderate intensity exercise. It offers a non-invasive, integrative measure sensitive to both intensity and duration, providing a valuable complementary perspective on systemic regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.