SynthesisHematological oncology2026
Non-Relapse Mortality With Bispecific Antibodies in Hematologic Malignancies: A Dual Systematic Review and Pharmacovigilance Analysis.
Synthesis in Hematological oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Non-Relapse Mortality With Bispecific Antibodies in Hematologic Malignancies: A Dual Systematic Review and Pharmacovigilance Analysis.Hematological oncology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) redirect T-cells to tumor antigens in an MHC-independent manner. These universally available, off-the-shelf products have demonstrated unprecedented efficacy in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) hematological malignancies (HMs). The indefinite treatment duration associated with most BsAb products, coupled with neutropenia, B-cell aplasia, and hypogammaglobulinemia result in significant immune-related toxicities and infections. Hence, non-relapse mortality (NRM) which represents the cumulative burden of treatment-related toxicities, defined as death from any cause other than disease relapse or progression, is a patient-centric endpoint across cellular therapy platforms. While recent NRM estimates with CAR T-cell therapy have identified infections as major drivers of NRM, real-world NRM estimates remain limited with BsAbs. To mitigate the limitations associated with each of the methods, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature, supplemented concurrently by a pharmacovigilance analysis using the FAERS database, to estimate NRM with BsAbs and compare real-world findings between commercially available BsAb products approved for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and NHL. The primary endpoint was NRM; secondary endpoints included CRS, ICANS, infections, and death. Teclistamab demonstrated a high toxicity burden across both analytic methods, with the highest ICANS incidences, significantly greater infection rates (particularly grade > 3), and a non-negligible NRM estimate in the SRMA as well in FAERS. Glofitamab was associated with severe toxicities, including increased reporting odds for NRM and overall mortality. Mosunetuzumab showed lower pooled estimates and lower reporting odds, as seen in both analytic approaches. Low pooled incidences of infections, and ICANS were calculated in the SRMA. FAERS analyses also suggested reduced reporting odds for NRM and neurotoxicity. While trial-level data and real-world reporting largely converged for severe toxicities, divergences in other agents underscore the importance of continuous post-marketing surveillance. Given the risks associated with prolonged treatment, future protocols must prioritize infection management and adopt NRM as a standardized endpoint to guide appropriate therapeutic selection and sequencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42886051What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.