Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42885826›Full record

ArticleFEBS open bio2026

A nationwide student survey on biochemistry learning resources in Italy.

Anna Marabotti, Ivano Eberini, Maria Luisa Genova, Francesca Mensitieri, Francesco Malatesta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEBS open bio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna MarabottiSIB Education Group Committee, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9510-5205
Ivano EberiniSIB Education Group Committee, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5521-3829
Maria Luisa GenovaSIB Education Group Committee, Italy.
Francesca MensitieriSIB Education Group Committee, Italy.
Francesco MalatestaSIB Education Group Committee, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biochemistry is widely recognized as a crucial discipline in life sciences. However, learning biochemistry poses significant challenges, requiring students to understand complex molecular concepts while integrating knowledge across multiple disciplines. This necessitates instructors to innovate their teaching of biochemistry, considering students' learning behaviors. Here, we present the results of a nationwide survey of university students, conducted by the Education Group of the Italian Society of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, from more than 2000 students across 49 academic institutions in Italy, with the aim of capturing not only which learning resources are relied on but also the underlying motivations for their choices and perceptions of biochemistry. Results show that overall, biochemistry is perceived as an interesting subject to study, even if challenging. Students primarily rely on instructor-provided materials, such as lecture slides, as well as self-acquired resources, including audio recordings and personal notes. Textbooks are used mainly as references when the preferred materials above do not sufficiently support students' learning. AI tools are increasingly used but not yet preferred. This strong reliance on teacher guidance underscores the need for high-quality teaching materials and greater integration of practical, application-oriented learning activities. By mapping these trends, our survey provides a foundation for critical reflection on current teaching practices and offers insights that may guide the development of more effective learning tools. Our broader goal is to support educators in creating environments that foster deeper understanding, sustained engagement, and a more inclusive learning experience in biochemistry.

Indexed as

biochemistry educationlearning materialsstudent learning behaviorsstudent perceptionsteaching and learning resources

Identifiers

PMID42885826
PMCPMC13673930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.