ArticleFEBS open bio2026
A nationwide student survey on biochemistry learning resources in Italy.
Article in FEBS open bio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biochemistry is widely recognized as a crucial discipline in life sciences. However, learning biochemistry poses significant challenges, requiring students to understand complex molecular concepts while integrating knowledge across multiple disciplines. This necessitates instructors to innovate their teaching of biochemistry, considering students' learning behaviors. Here, we present the results of a nationwide survey of university students, conducted by the Education Group of the Italian Society of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, from more than 2000 students across 49 academic institutions in Italy, with the aim of capturing not only which learning resources are relied on but also the underlying motivations for their choices and perceptions of biochemistry. Results show that overall, biochemistry is perceived as an interesting subject to study, even if challenging. Students primarily rely on instructor-provided materials, such as lecture slides, as well as self-acquired resources, including audio recordings and personal notes. Textbooks are used mainly as references when the preferred materials above do not sufficiently support students' learning. AI tools are increasingly used but not yet preferred. This strong reliance on teacher guidance underscores the need for high-quality teaching materials and greater integration of practical, application-oriented learning activities. By mapping these trends, our survey provides a foundation for critical reflection on current teaching practices and offers insights that may guide the development of more effective learning tools. Our broader goal is to support educators in creating environments that foster deeper understanding, sustained engagement, and a more inclusive learning experience in biochemistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.