ArticleFamily practice2026
Entry into long-term care disrupts primary care continuity-but only at entry: a national cohort study of transitional and post-entry continuity in facility- and home-based care in Australia.
Article in Family practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundContinuity of primary care is central to older adults' health and wellbeing, but entry into long-term care can disrupt established care relationships.
objectivesThis study aimed to characterize how continuity of care evolves across the transition into long-term care and the post-entry period, comparing facility-based and home-based care, with analyses stratified by metropolitan and non-metropolitan location.
methodsA national cohort study of Australians aged ≥65 who entered long-term care in 2019 and had at least three primary care visits within 6 months was conducted. Transitional continuity was defined by whether individuals continued seeing their pre-entry provider. Post-entry continuity was measured using the Usual Provider Index. Cohort differences were examined using regression models.
resultsAmong 69 081 entrants (home-based = 27 915; facility-based = 41 166), 72% of those entering facilities changed to a new provider, compared with 10% in home-based long-term care, p < .001. In facility-based long-term care, switching to a new provider was more common in metropolitan areas than in non-metropolitan areas. Post-entry continuity was high in both settings, with 78%-80% of visits delivered by a usual provider.
conclusionsEntry into facility-based long-term care substantially disrupts established primary care relationships, but continuity is rapidly re-established after entry. The greater disruption observed in metropolitan areas suggests that factors beyond relocation, such as primary care availability and delivery models, shape transitional continuity. These findings identify long-term care entry as a key intervention point while indicating that post-entry care models effectively consolidate continuity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.