Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42885469›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2026

Accounting for Variability Across Years, Depths, and Non-Target Reads Improves Quantification of Root Community Composition in Plant Mixtures.

Emma K Rice, Jason C Keagy, Terrence H Bell, Liana T Burghardt, Jason P Kaye, Carolyn J Lowry

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emma K RiceIntercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1264-9988
Jason C KeagyIntercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1235-4837
Terrence H BellDepartment of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3603-7270
Liana T BurghardtIntercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0239-1071
Jason P KayeIntercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Carolyn J LowryIntercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7695-1596

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2023-67011-40329National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2023-67019-39791National Institute of Food and Agriculture PEN04759National Institute of Food and Agriculture PEN04760National Institute of Food and Agriculture PEN04768Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2023-03411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One key challenge in characterizing plant communities is determining the relative abundance of distinct species in root biomass. Metabarcoding is increasingly used to estimate a species' proportion in root mass based on its proportion in sample reads, but results have been mixed in accurately converting sequencing output to species mass in mixture. We created calibration mixtures from four focal plant species to determine how the association between a species' proportion in mass and its proportion in sequencing reads of the rbcL chloroplast gene varied across sample years, soil depth, and non-target proportion of reads. We also determined whether including these explanatory variables in prediction models could improve accuracy. We found the association between a species' proportion in reads and its proportion in mass varied across years and non-target proportion of reads, and to a lesser extent, rooting depth, and incorporating these explanatory factors into prediction models improved prediction accuracy. A secondary objective was to determine the number of calibration levels and sequencing depth required to accurately predict a species' proportion in mass. Through simulations, we estimated that 42 calibration samples (seven proportional levels * three years * two depths) and 700 reads per sample consistently obtained accurate predictions for simple mixtures. The association between a species' proportion in mass and proportion in reads can vary considerably, and our study suggests that measuring and explaining this variation can lead to more accurate predictions of the relative abundance of plants within root biomass using metabarcoding.

Indexed as

BiotaPlant RootsPlantsDNA Barcoding, Taxonomiccalibration mixturescover cropsmetabarcodingplant communitiesroot abundance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.