Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42885434›Full record

ArticleArchiv der Pharmazie2026

K

Tahir Ulu, Henrik Siemer, Alexa Heuer, Sandra Schimmelpfennig, Peter Dieterich, Jesús Borrego, György Panyi, Albrecht Schwab

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archiv der Pharmazie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. KArchiv der Pharmazie · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tahir UluInstitut für Physiologie II, University Münster, Münster, Germany.
Henrik SiemerInstitut für Physiologie II, University Münster, Münster, Germany.
Alexa HeuerInstitut für Physiologie II, University Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1611-3349
Sandra SchimmelpfennigInstitut für Physiologie II, University Münster, Münster, Germany.
Peter DieterichInstitut für Physiologie, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Jesús BorregoDepartment of Biophysics and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
György PanyiDepartment of Biophysics and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6227-3301
Albrecht SchwabInstitut für Physiologie II, University Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9280-2099

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft ChembionDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GRK 2515/2MedK, Medical Faculty of the University of MünsterMinistry of Culture and Innovation of Hungary 2024-1.2.3-HU-RIZONT-2024-00099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutrophil granulocytes exhibit dynamic changes in membrane potential upon stimulation with the complement component C5a. It is not well-defined which ion channels are responsible for membrane potential dynamics in neutrophils, although ion channel signaling has been linked to neutrophil behavior. Here, we investigated the contribution of K

Indexed as

Intermediate-Conductance Calcium-Activated Potassium ChannelsKv1.3 Potassium ChannelMembrane PotentialsNeutrophilsPotassium Channels, Inwardly RectifyingCell MovementChemotaxisComplement C5aHumansLeukotriene B4Potassium Channel BlockersComplement C5aIntermediate-Conductance Calcium-Activated Potassium ChannelsKCNN4 protein, humanKir2.1 channelKv1.3 Potassium ChannelLeukotriene B4Potassium Channel BlockersPotassium Channels, Inwardly RectifyingchemotaxisKCa3.1Kir2.1Kv1.3LTB4membrane potential dynamicsNeutrophil granulocyte

Identifiers

PMID42885434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.