ArticleGlobal health action2026
Countering failures of imagination: governance, human development and public health in low- and middle-income countries.
Article in Global health action, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dramatic cuts in global aid have irrevocably changed the health funding landscape in Low- and Middle- Income Countries (LMICs), creating significant challenges for national governments. But there is a silver lining: these changes give national governments greater agency to set development goals. This moment of disruption demands bold thinking; it is an opportunity to place human development above sector-specific outcomes at the heart of national priority setting and reframe investments in public health accordingly. The social conditions that shape a person's health are the same conditions that shape their education, wealth, and a myriad of other outcomes within the social sector. Yet, despite strong momentum towards intersectoral collaborative approaches to governance, particularly in health, many government departments across the social sector continue to operate as siloes, neither prioritising nor implementing investments that target common or overlapping causes to improve outcomes across sectors. The dominant models of governance are insufficient to this task. We need innovations in governance that move beyond both traditional sector-specific approaches and newer intersectoral frameworks towards restructured government models that fundamentally transcend sectoral boundaries. We describe the limitations of current approaches, and explore how alternative governance structures might look in practice, and consider their implications for the health sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.