ArticleBrain and behavior2026
Assessing Body Image in Multiple Sclerosis: Adaptation and Validation of the Modified Body Image Scale.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) is frequently associated with physical, cognitive, and emotional changes, including functional loss, which may significantly affect body image (BI) perception. However, a BI questionnaire specifically adapted for use with people with MS (PwMS) is currently lacking. This study aims to adapt and validate the original Italian version of the Body Image Scale (BIS) for the MS population and to examine its psychometric properties.
methodsA three-phase adaptation process was conducted, involving a panel of MS experts and PwMS to ensure coherence with MS clinical characteristics, as well as item relevance and clarity. The psychometric properties of the modified BIS (mBIS) were evaluated, including content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and minimal detectable change (MDC).
resultsThe modified version of the BIS was established. A total of 208 PwMS (mean age (SD): 50.9 (14.6) years; females: 144; mean self-reported EDSS (SD): 4.0 (1.96)) completed an online survey. The one-factor structure was confirmed (CFI = 0.977, TLI = 0.968, SRMR = 0.059), with high internal consistency (McDonald's ω = 0.963; Cronbach's α = 0.942); and good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.88). The mBIS showed a moderate correlation with anxiety (r = 0.52), a high correlation with depression (r = 0.67), and a low negative correlation with interoceptive awareness (r = -0.24) (all p < 0.001). The MDC was 6.73 and SEM for total score was 2.88. The mean (SD) mBIS score was 12.9 (9.0).
conclusionsThis study supports the validity and reliability of the mBIS as a tool for assessing BI in PwMS. The findings highlight the relevance of BI concerns in MS and their potential role in psychological well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42885340What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.