Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42885073›Full record

ReviewPolymers2026

Polymer Flooding for EOR: Field Applications, Recovery Performance, Injectivity, and Scale-Up Lessons (2005-2025).

Rafael E Hincapie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rafael E HincapieOMV Exploration and Production GmbH, Trabrennstraße 6-8, 1020 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1662-4064

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymer flooding is one of the most widely applied chemical enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technologies and has progressed from conventional onshore sandstone applications to increasingly challenging reservoir environments. This study reviews global polymer flooding experience from 2005 to 2025 using a curated database of 54 documented field applications, including injectivity tests, pilots, and commercial projects across sandstone, carbonate, unconsolidated, heavy oil, offshore, high-salinity, and high-temperature reservoirs. Field data, laboratory investigations, and reported operational experience were evaluated to assess injectivity behavior, polymer retention, viscosity stability, recovery performance, surveillance practices, and implementation outcomes. The reviewed projects span reservoir temperatures from 16 to 124 °C and salinities from approximately 500 to 270,000 ppm total dissolved solids. The analysis shows that successful polymer flood applications are consistently associated with effective mobility control, sustained injectivity, appropriate polymer quality, surveillance-supported reservoir management, and disciplined operational execution. Advances in ATBS-containing and thermally stable polymers have expanded applicability into harsher reservoir conditions, although many developments remain at the injectivity assessment or pilot stage. The resulting synthesis provides a field-based framework linking reservoir conditions, injectivity, polymer performance, surveillance, and operational execution to support screening, qualification, design, scale-up, and decision-making for future polymer flood developments.

Indexed as

chemical enhanced oil recovery (EOR)field applicationsinjectivitypolymer floodingpolymer retentionscale-up

Identifiers

PMID42885073
PMCPMC13667641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.