Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42885065›Full record

ArticlePolymers2026

Numerical Laminate Screening of Pin-Loaded CFRP Driveshaft Joints Using Progressive Damage Analysis and Multi-Criteria Evaluation.

Liming Zheng, Lingze Yuan, Nengwen Wang, Xintian Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Liming ZhengCollege of New Energy Automotive Engineering, Luoyang Vocational College of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471822, China.ORCID 0009-0000-8854-515X
Lingze YuanSchool of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China.
Nengwen WangSchool of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China.
Xintian LiuSchool of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3395-9176

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai 25ZR1401146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) driveshafts offer significant lightweight potential, but the performance of pin-loaded joints is strongly affected by laminate architecture. To support laminate selection beyond peak strength alone, a numerical screening framework combining finite-element analysis, Hashin-based progressive damage modeling, and multi-criteria evaluation was developed. Seven representative layups were compared under axial compression considering off-axis fiber orientation, stacking order, hoop restraint, and mid-plane symmetry. The results showed that Layup 3 achieved the highest peak load of 28.38 kN but exhibited abrupt brittle failure, whereas Layup 1 reached 22.02 kN with more gradual post-peak degradation and localized progressive damage. Removal of hoop-oriented plies promoted longitudinal splitting-type deformation, while asymmetric stacking reduced deformation stability. By integrating peak load, effective energy absorption, and failure safety, Layup 1 achieved the highest comprehensive evaluation index of 0.612 and remained preferred when the safety weight exceeded approximately 0.2. Within the present numerical framework, the proposed approach provides a practical basis for preliminary laminate screening of CFRP driveshaft joints.

Indexed as

CFRP driveshaft jointfailure mechanismlaminate architecturemulti-criteria evaluationprogressive damage

Identifiers

PMID42885065
PMCPMC13667113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.