ArticlePolymers2026
Citric Acid-Urea Modification of Dual-Plasticized Starch Adhesives for Medium-Density Fiberboard Manufacturing.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Formaldehyde-free starch adhesives offer a renewable alternative to conventional binders used in medium-density fiberboard (MDF), but their application remains limited by poor moisture resistance and insufficient mechanical performance. The aim of this research work was to investigate and evaluate the combined effects of sorbitol and glycerol plasticizers, citric acid modification, and urea addition on the properties of starch-based adhesives and the resulting MDF panels. Five adhesive formulations were prepared and characterized using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Laboratory MDF panels were manufactured and evaluated for thickness swelling (TS), water absorption (WA), internal bond strength (IB), modulus of rupture (MOR), and modulus of elasticity (MOE). Among the tested formulations, the hybrid adhesive system, composed of sorbitol/starch/glycerol/urea/citric acid (SSGUC), provided the best overall performance. Panels bonded with SSGUC exhibited the lowest TS and WA after both 2 and 24 h of water immersion, with TS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.