Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42884994›Full record

ArticlePolymers2026

Deformation-Aware Monte Carlo Assessment of a Bi

Ahmed Alharbi, Zeyad Alawaji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ahmed AlharbiDepartment of Physics, College of Science, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0002-0660-721X
Zeyad AlawajiDepartment of Radiologic Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flexible shielding polymers may undergo geometric thinning during tensile use or localized damage, but flat-sheet attenuation measurements cannot resolve the resulting spatial loss of protection. A radiation-transport surrogate comprising 60 wt% thermoplastic polyurethane and 40 wt% Bi2O3 (modeled density, 1.835 g cm-3) was investigated using prescribed deformation, Geant4, PHITS, Phy-X/XCOM, and 60-120 kVp SpekPy spectra. This is a computational transport model, not a mechanically or experimentally validated formulation. Geant4 mass attenuation coefficients were verified against Phy-X at six energies (30-100 keV) and against XCOM at 90, 91, 92, and 95 keV across the Bi K-edge. Constant-volume uniform strain of 50% raised whole-field transmission by 14.8-32.8%; an illustrative transverse-response sensitivity quantified the dependence of thickness and attenuation on the prescribed kinematics. At 50% local thinning, whole-field transmission increased by only 5.66-15.0%, whereas 5-million-history event-based ROI scoring gave dose enhancement factors of 2.435±0.106, 1.823±0.064, 1.508±0.048, and 1.395±0.042 at 60, 80, 100, and 120 kVp, respectively. Additional 60 kVp calculations varied the defect dimensions, ROI size, and detector position, revealing the influence of spatial averaging. Beer-Lambert attenuation accounts for the primary response to prescribed uniform thinning; the Monte Carlo framework additionally resolves polychromatic scatter, spectral changes, and localized dose enhancement. These numerical results characterize idealized geometric perturbations and should not be interpreted as measurements of real garment durability or clinical dose.

Indexed as

bismuth oxidedeformationGeant4local thinningMonte CarloPHITSSpekPythermoplastic polyurethanewearable radiation protectionX-ray shielding

Identifiers

PMID42884994
PMCPMC13666912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.