ArticlePolymers2026
Cellulose Isolated from Giant Miscanthus by Nitric Acid Treatment with Acid Recycling.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stems of giant miscanthus-a perennial grass crop-were investigated in this study. The Kürschner cellulose content was determined to be 52.8 wt%, indicating that this feedstock holds considerable promise for cellulose isolation. For the first time, cellulose was isolated from giant miscanthus stems via a modified nitric acid process involving treatment of the feedstock with nitric acid at the first stage with fivefold acid recycling. The isolated cellulose samples were characterized by consistently high and mutually comparable quality. A high α-cellulose content of 92.0-94.0 wt% and a high degree of polymerization of 1750-1850 were achieved, along with minor contents of non-cellulosics: 0.41-1.06 wt% acid-insoluble lignin, 3.12-3.82 wt% pentosans, and 0.13-0.35 wt% ash. This method ensures the isolation of high-quality cellulose in a 36% yield. At the same time, the content of non-cellulosics were reduced manifold, specifically: lignin by 24.6-63.7 times, pentosans by 4.0-6.2 times, and ash by 5.9-15.9 times, which corresponds to their extraction degree of 98%, 81% and 90% on average, respectively. A pooled cellulose sample was characterized by SEM, IR spectroscopy, and TGA/DTA/DTG. The obtained results justify the use of the modified nitric acid method with fivefold recycling of the spent nitric acid solution, which would reduce reagent and water consumption without compromising the quality attributes of the resulting cellulose. The practical value lies in the experimental demonstration that high-polymer cellulose can be obtained from giant miscanthus with a degree of polymerization reaching 1850, which significantly expands the potential applications of cellulose and its chemical modification products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.