ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Multimodal Plant-Animal Communication: Signaling Mechanisms, Coevolution, and Environmental Disruption.
Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plant-animal communication involves diverse forms of information transfer that can mediate ecologically important interactions, including pollination, seed dispersal, herbivory, and plant defense. This review synthesizes current knowledge of the chemical, visual, gustatory, electrical, acoustic, and vibrational information involved in these interactions, with particular emphasis on volatile organic compounds, herbivore-derived elicitors and effectors, multimodal signaling, sensory perception, learning, and evolutionary processes, including coevolution where reciprocal evidence is available. A central distinction is made between detectable traits or cues and functional biological signals, emphasizing the need for evidence linking signal production or modification to receiver detection, behavioral or physiological responses, and ecologically meaningful outcomes. Acoustic and vibrational phenomena are considered critically because their communicative significance remains less firmly established than that of chemical and visual signaling. The review further examines how climate change and other anthropogenic pressures may alter signal production, transmission, perception, and phenological synchrony, thereby reorganizing plant-animal interactions. Genetic manipulation of hormonal, volatile, and specialized-metabolite pathways is also evaluated as a potential tool for modifying plant signaling, together with its possible unintended ecological consequences. By integrating plant physiology, sensory ecology, animal behavior, evolution, and environmental change, this review identifies major evidence gaps and highlights the importance of plant-animal communication for biodiversity conservation, pollination, biological control, and sustainable agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.