Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42884821›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026

RNA Activation in Plants: Current Evidence and Molecular Insights.

Alexandra S Dubrovina, Konstantin V Kiselev

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexandra S DubrovinaLaboratory of Biotechnology, Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 690022 Vladivostok, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0516-6144
Konstantin V KiselevLaboratory of Biotechnology, Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 690022 Vladivostok, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1025-6491

Funding

The Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation 124012200181-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current scientific literature presents increasing evidence for the existence of the RNA activation (RNAa) phenomenon in eukaryotes. RNAa is a molecular mechanism by which gene expression is activated through small activating RNAs (saRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs). The RNAa pathway shares many similarities with RNA interference (RNAi), yet it represents a distinct regulatory process. While RNAi is a relatively well-characterized process involving Dicer-like endonucleases that process double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) into small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), ultimately leading to gene silencing, the molecular mechanisms underlying RNAa remain poorly understood. This review summarizes and discusses the current knowledge of RNA-mediated activation of gene expression in plants, highlighting this emerging research area beyond gene silencing. While research on RNAa in plants remains limited, available data support the existence of RNA-triggered gene activation and RdDM-associated transcriptional derepression at specific plant loci. Whether these phenomena constitute a unified RNAa pathway analogous to that described in animals remains to be determined. A broader understanding of RNAa-related processes is essential for advancing plant science and developing innovative strategies in plant molecular biology and biotechnology.

Indexed as

DNA methylationdouble-stranded RNA (dsRNA)exogenous RNAgene expressionRNA activationRNA interference (RNAi)small activating RNAs (saRNAs)small interfering RNAs (siRNAs)small RNAtranscriptional activation

Identifiers

PMID42884821
PMCPMC13667248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.