ReviewNutrients2026
Trendy, but Are They Safe? Current Popular Diets and Their Use in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Narrative Review.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) arises from the interplay between genetic susceptibility, immune dysregulation, microbiota, and environmental exposures, with diet potentially contributing to both pathogenesis and management. Patients frequently modify their diet independently, often using different strategies during remission and active symptoms. This narrative review synthesises evidence on patient-accessible dietary patterns and selected structured nutritional therapies across five domains: incident IBD, objective intestinal inflammation, gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life, nutritional safety, and real-world feasibility. Mediterranean and other minimally processed plant-forward patterns are associated with higher diet quality and potentially favourable microbial and metabolic profiles; however, current trials do not demonstrate consistent superiority for objective remission or mucosal healing. Western and ultra-processed food-rich patterns are associated with incident IBD, whereas evidence for relapse in established disease is less consistent. Low-FODMAP approaches may improve selected symptoms but should not be interpreted as anti-inflammatory therapy. Evidence for ketogenic and intentional carnivore diets remains insufficient for routine use. Exclusive enteral nutrition and the Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet have distinct, protocolised therapeutic roles, particularly in Crohn's disease. Across strategies, affordability, food security, cooking resources, disease phenotype, nutritional risk, and access to specialist dietetic care determine safe and equitable implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.