ReviewNutrients2026
Iron Supplementation and Copper Homeostasis: Evidence for Potential Copper Depletion, Biomarker Challenges, and Clinical Implications.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Iron deficiency remains a major nutritional problem, particularly among women of reproductive age, pregnant women, infants, and children. Oral iron supplementation is the principal strategy for prevention and treatment, but the biological interdependence of iron and copper metabolism raises concern that prolonged or excessive iron exposure may impair copper availability in susceptible individuals. This review summarizes human and animal evidence linking iron supplementation or high dietary iron intake to altered copper homeostasis, with emphasis on underlying mechanisms, biomarker limitations, and clinical implications. Human studies report inconsistent changes in serum copper and ceruloplasmin, suggesting that baseline mineral status, physiological demand, iron dose, treatment duration, inflammation, and biomarker selection may influence responses. Animal studies provide stronger mechanistic evidence that high iron intake can reduce intestinal copper absorption and copper-dependent ferroxidase activity, promote tissue iron sequestration, and contribute to anemia, impaired growth, cardiac enlargement, dyslipidemia, gastrointestinal alterations, and disrupted maternal-offspring copper transfer. However, the clinical relevance of these findings remains uncertain because standardized diagnostic criteria and sensitive biomarkers for marginal copper deficiency are lacking. Iron intervention should remain guided by confirmed iron status, while dose, duration, and treatment response warrant careful consideration. Evaluation of copper status may be particularly relevant when hematological recovery is inadequate despite sufficient iron stores or when additional risk factors for copper deficiency are present. Prospective human studies incorporating functional biomarkers are needed to identify susceptible populations and clinically relevant exposure conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.