ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Advances in Deep Learning Models for Ground Deformation Prediction Using InSAR Approach: A Systematic Review with Special Emphasis on Subsidence as a Geo-Environmental Hazard.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ground deformation, especially subsidence, is a geo-environmental hazard that needs to be assessed and predicted in advance to mitigate its effects efficiently and in a timely manner. Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) provides high-resolution, all-weather ground deformation monitoring, while advances in Deep Learning (DL) have significantly improved its analytical capabilities. Despite growing interest in integrating DL with InSAR, existing systematic reviews have focused mainly on urban infrastructure, leaving mining-induced subsidence comparatively underexplored. This review addresses this gap by applying the PRISMA framework to systematically evaluate 162 peer-reviewed studies, including 21 core articles on DL-based mining subsidence and 58 supporting studies from related deformation applications. This paper examines DL architectures, including CNNs, LSTMs, GRUs, ConvLSTMs, Transformers, and Graph Neural Networks, and assesses their roles in data decomposition, spatiotemporal feature extraction, hyperparameter optimization, and multi-source data fusion. Comparative analysis of 71 models shows that attention-enhanced CNN-LSTM and ConvLSTM architectures consistently outperform single-model approaches. Key challenges include limited mining datasets, poor cross-site transferability, lack of standardized benchmarks, and insufficient geomechanical integration. Finally, we propose a seven-point research roadmap to support reliable, explainable, transferable, and operational early-warning systems for mining-induced subsidence monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.