Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42884555›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Channel-Specific Stimulus Sensitivity, Reliability, and Complementarity of Multimodal Wearable Sensing During Short-Form Influencer Video Exposure.

Carolina Del-Valle-Soto, Violeta Corona, Regina Gómez Padilla, Fátima Sofía Walls Fernández, Juan-Carlos López-Pimentel, Carlos Mex-Perera, Paolo Visconti, José Varela-Aldás

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carolina Del-Valle-SotoFacultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Panamericana, Álvaro del Portillo 49, Zapopan 45010, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-0272-3275
Violeta CoronaFacultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad Panamericana, Álvaro del Portillo 49, Zapopan 45010, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-3410-7693
Regina Gómez PadillaFacultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Panamericana, Álvaro del Portillo 49, Zapopan 45010, Jalisco, Mexico.
Fátima Sofía Walls FernándezFacultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Panamericana, Álvaro del Portillo 49, Zapopan 45010, Jalisco, Mexico.
Juan-Carlos López-PimentelFacultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Panamericana, Álvaro del Portillo 49, Zapopan 45010, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7844-3261
Carlos Mex-PereraCollege of Engineering Technology, Rochester Institute of Technology, One Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8682-5983
Paolo ViscontiDepartment of Innovation Engineering, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4058-4042
José Varela-AldásCentro de Investigaciones de Ciencias Humanas y de la Educación (CICHE), Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Ambato 180103, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-4084-1424

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multimodal wearable sensing is increasingly used to quantify audience engagement with short-form video, yet it remains unclear which sensing channels actually carry stimulus-driven information at the exposure durations typical of this format. We recorded electrodermal activity, photoplethysmographic pulse, triaxial acceleration, video-based eye tracking, and automated facial expression analysis from 50 young adults while they viewed 20 short-form influencer clips (5.6-19.3 s) presented in individually randomized order, yielding 1000 participant × clip trials and 12 primary indices spanning four modalities. Using crossed random-effects variance partitioning, split-half reliability with Spearman-Brown projection, permutation-based multivariate testing, participant-wise decoding, and inter-subject correlation, we show that stimulus-driven variance is strongly channel-specific: it reaches 13.7% for fixation rate and 10.2% for facial engagement but only 0.11% for pulse rate and 0.23% for RMSSD. Clip-level estimates were highly reliable for facial and oculomotor indices (r=0.82-0.94) and poor for autonomic indices (r=0.34-0.58), which would require 134-370 participants to reach ρ=0.80. Between-modality dependence was almost six times weaker than within-modality dependence, and five components were retained by parallel analysis. Oculomotor and facial features jointly identified individual clips at 16.8% balanced accuracy against a 5% chance level, whereas electrodermal and pulse features, taken separately, did not exceed chance. Electrodermal responses were nonetheless stimulus-locked in 18 of 20 clips. A per-second re-analysis of nine channels showed that the ordering partly reverses for within-clip dynamics: tonic electrodermal and pupil time courses were reliable across viewers (ρ50=0.88 and 0.93), facial time courses were not (ρ50≤0.69), and pulse rate was unreliable under both treatments. We derive explicit design guidance for sensor selection and sample size in short-exposure multimodal engagement studies.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesWearable Electronic DevicesAdultEye-Tracking TechnologyFacial ExpressionFemaleGalvanic Skin ResponseHumansMalePhotoplethysmographyReproducibility of ResultsVideo RecordingYoung Adultelectrodermal activityeye trackingfacial expression analysisinter-subject correlationmeasurement reliabilitymultimodal sensingphotoplethysmographysensor fusionshort-form videovariance components

Identifiers

PMID42884555
PMCPMC13667562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.