ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Fear-EEG-AI: A Conceptual and Operational Framework for Designing EEG-AI Systems for the Inference of Fear-Compatible Neurophysiological States.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) and artificial intelligence (AI) are central tools in affective computing, yet fear-related inference remains constrained by a gap between experimental performance and deployable evidence: high accuracy on controlled datasets guarantees neither neurobiological specificity, nor robustness across users, nor traceable inference. EEG does not measure fear directly; it captures cortical dynamics compatible with threat processing, arousal or vigilance. This paper introduces the Fear-EEG-AIFramework, a technology-independent architecture for designing, validating and deploying EEG-AI systems targeting fear-compatible neurophysiological states. Building on a prior systematic review, it organizes development into three hierarchical levels-neurobiological foundation, neuroelectric correlates and computational modeling-governed by six cross-cutting principles, and makes them evaluable through eight observable dimensions, the Fear-EEG-AI Alignment Index (FAI) and five validation evidence levels. Applied to the eight eligible studies of that corpus by two raters who had not drafted the instrument, with adjudication by a third, the rubric reached 67.2% exact agreement (quadratic-weighted κ=0.741; ICC(2,1) =0.744). Under 10,000 admissible weightings the equal-weight ordering survived in 10.1% of draws, and one of 56 ordered pairs met a stability criterion fixed before the pairwise results were tabulated. The index is therefore reported as a descriptor of methodological documentation and not as a ranking of implementations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.