Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42884552›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Fear-EEG-AI: A Conceptual and Operational Framework for Designing EEG-AI Systems for the Inference of Fear-Compatible Neurophysiological States.

Bladimir Serna, Ricardo Salazar, Gustavo A Alonso-Silverio, Rosario Baltazar, Elías Ventura-Molina, Antonio Alarcón-Paredes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bladimir SernaCentro de Innovación, Competitividad y Sostenibilidad, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Acapulco 39640, Guerrero, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4504-0095
Ricardo SalazarTecnología e Innovación (SECIHTI), Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Chilpancingo 39070, Guerrero, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-5844-8321
Gustavo A Alonso-SilverioFacultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Chilpancingo 39079, Guerrero, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2699-140X
Rosario BaltazarDivisión de Estudios de Posgrado, Tecnológico Nacional de México/Campus León, León 37290, Guanajuato, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-8847-8732
Elías Ventura-MolinaCentro de Innovación y Desarrollo Tecnológico en Computo, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 07738, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-6859-4309
Antonio Alarcón-ParedesCentro de Investigación en Computación, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 07738, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-9785-1252

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) and artificial intelligence (AI) are central tools in affective computing, yet fear-related inference remains constrained by a gap between experimental performance and deployable evidence: high accuracy on controlled datasets guarantees neither neurobiological specificity, nor robustness across users, nor traceable inference. EEG does not measure fear directly; it captures cortical dynamics compatible with threat processing, arousal or vigilance. This paper introduces the Fear-EEG-AIFramework, a technology-independent architecture for designing, validating and deploying EEG-AI systems targeting fear-compatible neurophysiological states. Building on a prior systematic review, it organizes development into three hierarchical levels-neurobiological foundation, neuroelectric correlates and computational modeling-governed by six cross-cutting principles, and makes them evaluable through eight observable dimensions, the Fear-EEG-AI Alignment Index (FAI) and five validation evidence levels. Applied to the eight eligible studies of that corpus by two raters who had not drafted the instrument, with adjudication by a third, the rubric reached 67.2% exact agreement (quadratic-weighted κ=0.741; ICC(2,1) =0.744). Under 10,000 admissible weightings the equal-weight ordering survived in 10.1% of draws, and one of 56 ordered pairs met a stability criterion fixed before the pairwise results were tabulated. The index is therefore reported as a descriptor of methodological documentation and not as a ranking of implementations.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceElectroencephalographyFearHumansaffective computingartificial intelligencebrain–computer interfaceselectroencephalography (EEG)explainable AIfear-compatible statesmethodological frameworkreal-world deployment

Identifiers

PMID42884552
PMCPMC13667737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.