ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
SBOA-Inspired Particle Swarm Optimization of XGBoost for False Data Injection Detection in P2P Energy Trading.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading depends on the integrity of smart-meter measurements and coordinator messages. This paper presents an XGBoost detector for false data injection attacks and a hybrid hyperparameter-search mechanism combining particle swarm optimization (PSO) with three hunting-inspired operators from the secretary bird optimization algorithm (SBOA). A common candidate-evaluation budget enables comparison of fixed XGBoost, PSO-XGBoost and SBOA-PSO-XGBoost. The evaluation covers four Austin dataset settings, two attack scenarios and nine classifiers, using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 and computational cost. The equal-scenario mean F1 scores are 90.06%, 94.47% and 96.94% for the three XGBoost variants, respectively. The hybrid adds 2.47 percentage points over PSO with a 5.16% increase in total computation time, while its batch-prediction cost remains close to that of PSO-XGBoost. These comparisons characterize the detection-cost trade-off and the role of hybrid search under a shared evaluation protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.