ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Design and Bench Evaluation of a Sensor-Integrated Prosthetic-Leg Prototype.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents the design and preliminary bench evaluation of a sensor-integrated prosthetic-leg prototype. The platform combines a multi-material PAHT-CF/TPU 95A foot, articulated knee and ankle mechanisms, two surface electromyography channels, an MPU6050 inertial measurement unit, an Arduino Uno controller, and MG995 servomotors. EMG threshold crossings select discrete knee-servomotor commands, while an accelerometer-derived inclination estimate selects between two ankle-servomotor commands. The evaluation comprised exploratory finite-element analyses, separate static compression tests, and qualitative demonstrations of the sensor-to-actuator pathways. The foot model predicted a maximum displacement of 25.96 mm under 400 N, whereas a separate compression test recorded approximately 7 mm at 1000 N; these values do not constitute quantitative model validation because the loading, constraints, and displacement measures differed. The shank model produced a maximum equivalent stress of 23.89 MPa, and a separate shank-knee assembly test reached approximately 1.85 kN. The foot-ankle connection produced a stress estimate of 203.6 MPa against an assumed strength value of 60 MPa, identifying a critical design limitation. Functional observations demonstrated sensor-triggered command execution, but joint tracking accuracy, response time, actuator output under load, and control repeatability were not quantified. The prototype therefore provides an initial laboratory platform for investigating mechanical and sensing integration; structural redesign and quantitative bench testing are required before any load-bearing or clinical use can be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.