ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Sensitivity of Inter-Point Distance Measurement to Control-Point Coordinate Error in a Panoramic Camera.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vision-based traffic monitoring recovers metric quantities such as inter-vehicle distances by mapping the image to the ground plane through a planar homography. In deployed systems, this homography is often fitted from ground control points whose world coordinates are obtained from satellite orthoimagery, where each coordinate is uncertain by about one image pixel. The impact of this control-point coordinate error on the measured distance has not been quantified for a single fixed camera. This paper evaluates a 180-degree panoramic camera (AXIS P3807-PVE) on two adjacent ground-plane regions, each referenced to RTK-surveyed control points and mapped by a separate homography. Control-point coordinates are perturbed with isotropic Gaussian noise, the homography is refitted, and the resulting change in inter-point distance between held-out evaluation points is measured against the unperturbed fit. The distance error is dominated by random scatter rather than systematic bias, and the scatter grows approximately linearly with the coordinate noise, at about 0.7 to 0.8 times the per-coordinate standard deviation within the tested range. The results indicate that distance error can be predicted from control-point coordinate accuracy, and that relative precision of those coordinates matters more than absolute georeferencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.