ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
An Artificial Intelligence Framework for Detection of Leukemia with Comparison Between Segmented and Non-Segmented Images.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate classification of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) subtypes from peripheral blood smear (PBS) images using deep learning may support automated image-based analysis of this blood malignancy.
methodsWe developed a custom lightweight Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to classify white blood cells into four subtypes: Benign, Early Pre-B ALL, Pre-B ALL, and Pro-B ALL. We assessed performance using accuracy, ROC curves, and explainability techniques, including upsampled feature map activations, occlusion sensitivity, and SHAP-style explanation overlays, comparing original (Non-segmented) and HSV-Segmented images. To mitigate patient-level data leakage without explicit patient identifiers, we further used unsupervised K-means clustering of HSV color histograms to group 3256 images into 89 "proxy-patient" clusters. Consequently, we implemented rigorous subject-level grouped 5-fold cross-validation and Hold-Out protocols alongside standard image-level evaluations.
resultsUnder standard image-level evaluation, the model achieved 98.8% accuracy on non-segmented images and 91.3% on segmented images. Crucially, this performance advantage was maintained under strict subject-level cross-validation (97.9% vs. 89.7%), confirming the robustness of the findings against data leakage. Explainability visualizations demonstrated that HSV segmentation discarded vital contextual morphological cues, increasing confusion between closely related subtypes.
conclusionsA lightweight CNN can accurately classify ALL subtypes directly from raw PBS images. The evaluated HSV segmentation degraded performance by removing contextual information. This study underscores the necessity of subject-level evaluation in medical imaging and indicates that mandatory preprocessing should be empirically justified rather than assumed beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.