ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Cabbage Detection and Counting Using YOLOv8-CBAM and Improved BoT-SORT for Greenhouse and Open Field Cultivation in Korea.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate plant counting supports stand assessment and crop management, but canopy overlap, camera motion, and temporary occlusion complicate video-based monitoring. This study developed an RGB image- and video-based framework for detecting, tracking, and counting cabbage seedlings and grown plants under greenhouse and open-field conditions. The framework integrated YOLOv8n with convolutional block attention modules (CBAM) and an improved BoT-SORT procedure incorporating trajectory persistence, short-gap relinking, class-consistent identity management, and counting-event filtering. Detector performance was evaluated across five independent training runs, counting performance across nine held-out videos, and tracking performance on four manually annotated videos. YOLOv8n-CBAM achieved mean precision, recall, mAP@0.50, and mAP@0.50:0.95 values of 0.880 ± 0.007, 0.920 ± 0.007, 0.960 ± 0.006, and 0.600 ± 0.008, respectively (mean ± sample standard deviation). The complete framework achieved 99.27% mean counting accuracy, a mean absolute error of 0.56 plants, a root mean square error of 0.88 plants, and an R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.