ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
An Adaptive State- and Morphology-Based Four-Event Segmentation Algorithm for Sit-to-Stand-to-Sit Cycles from Wii Balance Board Load Signals: An Exploratory Comparison with Noraxon Report-Consistent IMU Timing.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sit-to-stand (STS) tests are often summarized by completion time or repetition count; however, phase-specific analysis requires reproducible operational segmentation. We developed an adaptive state- and morphology-based algorithm that identified ten internal anchors in Wii Balance Board (WBB) vertical-load waveforms and derived an ordered P1-P4 chain representing cycle start, end of sit-to-stand, start of stand-to-sit, and cycle end, respectively. The algorithm was developed using 108 T1-T3 trials and then applied unchanged to a temporally separate batch of 24 T0 trials. Fourteen T0 participants overlapped with development and 10 were included in a descriptive subset of participants not represented in the development dataset. Complete chains were identified in 24/24 T0 trials and 10/10 descriptive-subset trials (100%; exact 95% CI, 69.2%-100%), versus 7/24 for the prespecified internal non-adaptive baseline. Complete-chain identification remained 100% across all three datasets under one-at-a-time perturbations of ±10% and ±20% of 52 frozen numerical parameters, although selected sit-down rules shifted local boundaries. Removing the separate seated-baseline/fallback component reduced complete-chain identification to 101/108, 12/24, and 8/10. Across 131 paired trials, WBB total-cycle duration differed from Noraxon software (MR 4.2.34 Software; Noraxon, Scottsdale, AZ, USA)-reported duration by -0.188 s (95% CI, -0.313 to -0.060). These differences reflect distinct operational timing definitions rather than error against an independent reference standard. Independent reference-event and external clinical studies remain necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.