ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Temporal Step Supervision for Robust Step Counting from Wearable Accelerometers.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Step-counting remains difficult in irregular walking, where step timing and signal patterns are less consistent than in controlled walking. We propose a step-counting model that uses step timing annotations as temporal supervision during training. Each step timestamp is expanded into a short temporal label interval, and a U-Net is used to localize step events because its dense prediction structure is well suited to temporal localization. The model is trained to estimate both where steps occur in the window and how many steps the window contains. The final count is obtained by summing the predicted values over time and dividing by the label width. On the Clemson wrist-worn dataset, the model achieves MAPE values of 4.61%, 9.90%, and 15.78% under regular, semi-regular, and irregular walking, respectively. Compared with classical step-detection algorithms and reproduced CNN, WaveNet, and LSTM baselines, the proposed model shows substantially lower error under irregular walking. On OxWalk, the model achieves 13.06% MAPE using only OxWalk training data, reaching performance comparable to fine-tuned Stepcount SSL, which relies on large-scale self-supervised pretraining. These results suggest that temporal step supervision improves robustness under irregular walking and can reduce dependence on large-scale external pretraining.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.