ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Individuality in Visual Representation of Pulse: A Comprehensive Analysis.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuality, a foundational concept of traditional medicine, has been increasingly challenged by the standardization of modern healthcare. The emergence of wearable technology offers a scalable pathway toward precision health. Here, we explored the comprehensive visual representation of wearable photoplethysmography signals from a single device using the phase-amplitude coupling method. We demonstrated that the coupling diagrams contain visually distinguishable regions of physiological frequency components, including those consistent with reference breathing rates (R-squared value of 0.86 for linear regression and mean absolute error of 0.017 Hz, i.e., 1.02 breaths/min) and related to reference heart rates (R-squared value of 0.89). A similarity analysis at 0.1 Hz revealed a complex relationship between photoplethysmography signals and the derived skin sympathetic nerve activity and pulse rate variability. The numerical coupling matrices were further utilized to achieve cross-day and cross-session individual identification through machine-learning classifiers. The two-dimensional CNN classifier performed the best in the cross-session scenarios, achieving 90.37% accuracy with an equal error rate of 2.86%. This comprehensive analysis depicts the overall physiological information and individuality contained in digital pulse signals, providing conceptual and methodological foundations for future personalized health research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.