ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Cue-Grounded Flight-Intent Understanding from Cinematic Air-Combat Scenes via Noise-Robust Multimodal Perception and Fusion.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Flight intent cannot always be inferred from aircraft motion because the purpose of a maneuver depends on its surrounding context. This study examines multimodal flight-intent understanding in cinematic air-combat footage. We introduce CineAeroIntent, a benchmark constructed from 3972 annotated candidate clips collected from Chinese air-combat films and television programs. After quality control, 3958 clips were retained and organized by observation perspective. Each sample contains an intent label and an explanation linked to evidence in the clip. Using Qwen2.5-Omni as the backbone, we evaluate Modality-Decoupled Expert Projection (MDEP), which assigns a separate low-rank update to each input stream, and Post-Projection Value-Gating (PPVG), which reduces the contribution of low-utility value representations before attention aggregation. The full model obtains 89.6% overall accuracy and 88.4% Macro F1. Under matched adaptation settings, accuracy increases from 82.3% with shared LoRA to 86.1% with MDEP and 89.6% with MDEP-PPVG. In a natural-subset stress test, the full model retains 95.7% of its lower-interference accuracy on clips with prominent background music, compared with 82.6% for the unadapted backbone. These results support cue-grounded multimodal modeling for cinematic flight-scene understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.