ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Macro-to-Micro Framework for Bridge-Deck Pavement-Distress Inspection Using LiDAR-Based Screening and YOLOv8s Image Detection: A Case Study of the Jingzhou Yangtze River Highway Bridge and Public Benchmark Data.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Timely bridge-deck pavement inspection must cover large areas while preserving the image detail needed to recognize local distress. This study develops a macro-to-micro workflow with separate LiDAR screening and YOLOv8s image-detection branches. Airborne LiDAR data from the Jingzhou Yangtze River Highway Bridge supported deck extraction and geometric screening. Processing included statistical outlier removal, coordinate normalization, voxel sampling, local plane fitting, residual and normal-discrepancy screening, and spatial clustering. Deck extraction retained 179,914 of 311,784 representative points. Geometric screening based on residual and normal discrepancy identified 17,075 suspected points. Region filtering followed by bounding-box export yielded 423 points in seven candidate regions for targeted inspection. The 2025 inspection report documented pavement distress, and site personnel confirmed corresponding distress within the screened regions. The image branch used the official image-level splits of UAV-PDD2023. The epoch-146 checkpoint achieved the highest validation mAP50 and was evaluated on the official-test split. Official-test precision reached 0.85591, with a recall of 0.85882, mAP50 of 0.88556, and mAP50-95 of 0.58195. The model detected all six pavement-distress classes under the fixed benchmark protocol. The two branches support wide-area geometric screening and detailed image analysis for bridge-deck pavement inspection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.