ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Long-Term BOTDA Baseline Assessment of a Fiber Optic Sensing Textile on a Composite Bridge Girder.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents a six-year assessment of the baseline comparability of a Brillouin optical time-domain analysis (BOTDA)-based sensing textile installed in a composite bridge girder under unloaded field conditions. Six monitoring campaigns collected from 2020 to 2025 were analyzed using campaign-temperature-corrected strain profiles. The known physical segmentation of the sensing path was used to evaluate cross-campaign behavior through segment-wise mean deviation, root-mean-square deviation (RMSD), percentile-based deviation, and position-wise drift-rate metrics. The results show clear segment-dependent variability, with larger deviations occurring mainly in the non-structural lead and return segments than in the bonded structural sensing sections. In the 2025 campaign, the combined bonded structural segments exhibited an RMSD of 292 µε and a 95th-percentile absolute deviation of 508 µε. Their mean drift rate was approximately -11 µε/year, with a 95th-percentile absolute drift rate of approximately 101 µε/year. These results indicate better long-term baseline repeatability within the bonded sensing path than in the non-structural portions of the measurement chain. However, because temperature correction was based on campaign-average surface measurements rather than a distributed temperature profile, residual thermal effects cannot be fully separated from the observed long-term variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.