ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Acoustic Features of Sustained Phonation for Schizophrenia Classification: A Feasibility Study.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Voice and speech are increasingly studied as indicators of mental health, but the acoustic features of sustained phonation in schizophrenia remain underexplored. This feasibility study examined whether a 500 ms sustained vowel /a/ contains meaningful information for distinguishing patients with schizophrenia from healthy controls. Recordings from 84 participants (41 patients, 43 controls) were analyzed using features from eight acoustic domains. Random Forest, XGBoost, and logistic regression were evaluated under four train-test configurations with data augmentation and participant-grouped cross-validation. Feature importance with Random Forest Gini index, supported by SHAP analysis, produced a compact data-driven 15-feature set (DD15). Random Forest trained with fixed DD15 on original and augmented recordings, and evaluated on original recordings, achieved an AUC of 0.887 ± 0.078, while fold-wise feature selection produced a more conservative 15-feature estimate of 0.837 ± 0.086. Amplitude skewness, harmonic-to-noise ratio, and shimmer measures were the most discriminative features. The conservative DD15 estimate was broadly comparable with the stronger alternative representations while retaining interpretability. Additional sensitivity analyses showed that adjustment for measured recording condition variables reduced, but did not eliminate, internal patient-control discrimination. These findings support the feasibility of sustained-vowel acoustic analysis for schizophrenia classification and emphasize the need for standardized, balanced multi-site validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.