ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Identification of Activity Breaks Using Accelerometry.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laboratory studies show that performing ~2 min of activity every 20-30 min, known as activity breaks, is associated with improved cardiometabolic health outcomes. However, objectively identifying these activity breaks in a free-living setting remains challenging. This study aimed to develop and validate an algorithm to detect activity breaks using accelerometer data. Thirty-one healthy adults (mean (SD) age 33 (12) y, 71% female) wore three accelerometers (ActiGraphs on the wrist and hip; ActivPAL on the thigh) while completing eight activity breaks, approximately 30 min apart. Participants self-recorded activity break start and stop times. Lasso regression with an 'activity break' definition was used to develop an algorithm that used all three accelerometers and for each accelerometer individually, using two-thirds of participant data for development and the remaining third for testing. External validation was undertaken using an independent dataset. For the three-device algorithm, the mean difference between predicted and reported activity breaks was 0.0 (95% CI: -1.7, 1.7), while predicted break duration was, on average, 0.9 min longer than the reported duration (95% CI: 0.2, 1.6). These findings suggest the algorithm accurately estimates the frequency and duration of activity breaks and may be useful for quantifying this behaviour in free-living studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.