Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42884351›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Architecture and Behavior-State Classification of a WebSocket-Based IMU Stream Extraction Workflow for Pico 4 Headsets.

Ruimeng Li, Zhixin Cai, Siyuan Song, Mingxuan Cai, You-Lei Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruimeng LiSchool of Design and Fashion, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China.
Zhixin CaiSchool of Design and Fashion, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China.ORCID 0009-0009-9067-9427
Siyuan SongSchool of Design and Fashion, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China.
Mingxuan CaiSchool of Design and Fashion, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China.
You-Lei FuSchool of Design and Fashion, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8756-0358

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motion exports from consumer virtual-reality headsets may obscure measurement semantics and acquisition timing. We audited Pico 4 Pro exports from 34 participants, each participating once. Thirty CSVs were available; excluding an 8.410 s export left 29 sessions and 45,560 samples. Source labels, raw axes, and hardware timestamps were absent. Post hoc timing groups comprised 27 ADB-like files (median 3.745 Hz) and two browser-compatible files (8.333 and 20.000 Hz), without confirming acquisition routes. Five acceleration-magnitude series and 28 Euler-field sets were constant. Reanalysis used trailing windows of up to 2.0 s, long-gap resets, and channel gates. A reset-matched 21-sample comparator changed 2.428% of ADB-like outputs and 0.864% in the two higher-rate files. Two raters supplied 661 paired one-second bins covering 2400 samples from ten selected sessions. Inter-rater kappa was 0.698 (session-cluster 95% CI 0.615-0.777). Agreement between a separate three-group gyro-based output and the raters were 0.530 (0.275-0.657) and 0.529 (0.317-0.618). The audit makes unavailable inputs, denominators, and configuration dependence explicit. It supports reproducible export-level analysis, not sensor accuracy or validated behavioral classification.

Indexed as

ADBdata qualityDeviceMotioninertial sensingPico 4 Proreproducibilitytime-based windowWebXR

Identifiers

PMID42884351
PMCPMC13667537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.