ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
LiDAR-Based SLAM: A Review of Algorithmic Modules and LiDAR-Inertial Integration Architectures.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) enables real-time six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) state estimation and spatial reconstruction in environments where global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) are unavailable or unreliable. Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) is particularly suited to this task because it provides direct geometric measurements and remains largely unaffected by ambient illumination. This review presents an architecture-centered synthesis of LiDAR-based SLAM, covering LiDAR-only and LiDAR-inertial systems through a dual-axis, architecture-centered taxonomy. The first axis distinguishes sensing configuration, while the second distinguishes the principal registration, representation, coupling, and estimator structures within the corresponding branches. Core algorithmic modules, including front-end registration, state estimation, loop closure, map representation, and back-end optimization, are examined to determine how their interactions affect accuracy, computational latency, robustness, and scalability. Comparisons of representative systems are integrated within the corresponding methodological sections. Quantitative results are compared only when the same dataset subset, metric, and evaluation protocol are shared, while results obtained under non-equivalent conditions are used only as contextual evidence. The analysis identifies recurring trade-offs between low-latency recursive estimation and globally consistent graph-based optimization, as well as between sparse feature-based, direct, and learning-based representations. It also highlights the field's progression toward continuous-time estimation, semantic scene understanding, adaptive map representations, neural implicit mapping, and uncertainty-aware sensor fusion. Finally, the review organizes future research around trustworthy estimation and recovery, environmental adaptability, persistent map maintenance, resource-bounded operation, and dependable interfaces with navigation and motion planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.