ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Adaptive Robotic Grippers for Intelligent Manipulation: A Review of Structural Compliance, Sensing, and Control.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing demand for flexible, high-precision, and low-damage manufacturing is driving industrial robotic grippers toward adaptive systems with compliant interaction, force regulation, and intelligent decision-making capabilities. However, their industrial deployment remains limited by three major challenges: the trade-off between structural compliance and load-bearing capability, the insufficient coordination between sensing performance and closed-loop force control, and the limited generalization and safety validation of learning-based methods. This review presents an engineering-oriented analysis of adaptive robotic grippers based on three paradigms: structural compliance, active compliance, and learning-enabled grasping. The design principles, performance characteristics, and application limitations of compliant mechanisms, variable stiffness structures, carbon fiber composites, embedded sensing, force control, data-driven methods, reinforcement learning, and model-data fusion are discussed. A comparative framework is established according to the adaptation mechanisms, key parameters, performance boundaries, and industrial applications. The analysis shows that representative underactuated grippers typically achieve 3-19 degrees of freedom, grasping success rates of 90-98%, and load capacities of approximately 10-50 N, but remain limited in force regulation. Actively compliant grippers achieve force errors of 0.1-1 N, position errors of 0.05-0.5 mm, and control frequencies of 500 Hz-1 kHz, while learning-enabled methods require 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.