ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Underwater Optical Imaging Systems: A Comprehensive Review of Technologies, Architectures and Mission-Driven Design Trade-Offs.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Underwater optical imaging plays a crucial role in marine exploration, ecological monitoring, underwater inspection, autonomous navigation, and scientific research, but it is heavily restricted by wavelength-dependent attenuation, scattering, refraction, and low visibility. This comprehensive review examines underwater optical imaging from a system-design perspective, integrating the physical principles of underwater light propagation with imaging modalities, illumination strategies, sensing technologies, computational methods, and system-level implementation considerations. A structured literature search was conducted using Scopus and Google Scholar, yielding 441 initially identified studies, of which 262 were retained after screening according to the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and seven additional recent studies were incorporated during revision, resulting in a final set of 269 publications. The reviewed literature is organized according to imaging modality and system architecture, including conventional RGB imaging, laser-based imaging, polarization imaging, multispectral and hyperspectral imaging, computational imaging, and AI-assisted approaches. Emphasis is placed on the relationship between environmental conditions, mission requirements, imaging range, illumination geometry, calibration, processing location, computational demand, and platform constraints. The analysis shows that no single imaging modality provides optimal performance across all underwater environments. Instead, effective system design requires matching the sensing and illumination strategy to water conditions, target distance, required image quality, available power, computational resources, and real-time requirements. The review therefore proposes a mission-oriented framework for understanding the principal trade-offs involved in the design and selection of underwater optical imaging systems and identifies adaptive acquisition, multimodal sensing, physics-informed AI, and optical-computational co-design as important directions for future development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.